Turkish Pediatric Nurses’ Use of Non-Pharmacological Methods for Postoperative Pain Relief in 6 to 12 Year Old Children
Emine Efe1, *, Derya Özcan2, Şevkiye Dikmen2, Nuray Altaş2
Identifiers and Pagination:Year: 2017
First Page: 56
Last Page: 64
Publisher ID: TOPAINJ-10-56
Article History:Received Date: 22/12/2016
Revision Received Date: 11/04/2017
Acceptance Date: 25/05/2017
Electronic publication date: 31/07/2017
Collection year: 2017
open-access license: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode). This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
This descriptive study was conducted for the purpose of describing the Turkish pediatric nurses’ use of non-pharmacological methods for relieving 6 to 12-year-old children’s postoperative pain.
This research was conducted with 92 pediatric nurses working at 17 university hospitals located in Turkey. Data were collected using a web based questionnaire and had to be completed electronically.
It was determined that the majority of the nurses give information about postoperative observation (79.3%), and postoperative pain (76.1%). In addition, it was determined that they have been encouraging children to ask about misconceptions (69.6%).
Based on these results, the Turkish pediatric surgical nurses used versatile non-pharmacological methods in children’s postoperative pain relief.
There have been numerous pediatric postoperative pain management studies over the past 20 years, yet children continue to experience avoidable postoperative pain [1-3]. Recent studies suggest that postoperative pain in children is often poorly managed [4-7]. The reasons for this may include nurses’ undermedicating for postoperative pain despite adequate prescription, nurses’ inadequate pain assessment and monitoring, and inadequate use of other pain relief methods due to lack of time, knowledge, skills, and organizational support [8-11]. Some European investigators reported, that nurses frequently use these methods [12,13] and another study showed, that nurses rarely use these methods to relieve pain .
Research focused on nurses’ use of non-pharmacological methods for pediatric postoperative pain relief has increased in the recent years. However, research evidence seems to be inconsistent. Non-pharmacological methods in children’s pain management can be classified as sensory or physical, cognitive and cognitive-behavioural interventions. Sensory interventions are those, that alleviate pain by stimulating sites of the body or those peripheral techniques, that involve stimulation of the skin. Cognitive methods make the child focus on something other than the pain; therefore their use is limited to older children because they require skills in symbolic thinking and verbal communication. Thus, most of the cognitive interventions cannot be used before school age. Cognitive-behavioural interventions involving central pain control are a combination of cognitive and physical activities to alleviate pain. They work by increasing children’s physical activity, decreasing anxiety and reducing maladaptive coping . These methods can be used independently for the relief of mild pain or in conjunction with pain medication for the relief of moderate to severe pain . Many of these methods have been used successfully for pain relief with school-aged children, who are able to cooperate and have adequate meta-cognitive maturity. School-aged children are at a concrete operational stage of thinking, they can begin to relate to psychological pain, and they desire to be in control of their situation.
Several studies examined the effectiveness of using one or a combination of two or more non-pharmacological methods for children’s pain relief [16-18]. The use of cognitive or cognitive-behavioural methods in pediatric pain relief has been reported in detail in many previous studies, including especially distraction , imagery , and preparatory information , whereas the effectiveness of breathing techniques and relaxation  in pain relief have attracted less interest. Twycross et al. showed, that nurses’ assessment and management of children’s pain is not consistent with published guidelines . Idvall et al. reported, that the non-pharmacological strategies used most frequently to manage children’s pain after tonsillectomy were thermal regulation and distraction . However, research shows an inconsistency between nurses’ self-reported data and observations of nurses’ behavior . Twycros reported that nurses did not, for example, routinely assess a child’s pain, or use non-drug methods of pain relief on a regular basis . Wennström et al. explored, what it meant for 6- to 9-year-old children to be hospitalized for day surgery, and found, that the main concern for these children was, that they were put into an unknown, unpredictable and distressful situation, which had to be endured . In Turkey, there are several studies related to the knowledge and beliefs of nurses on the nature, assessment and management of pain [26-31]. Despite the fact, that a variety of studies in non-pharmacological pediatric pain management have been conducted in many countries, even in Turkey, there is only little knowledge about, how pediatric surgical nurses in Turkey use non-pharmacological methods to relieve pain in 6 to 12 year old pediatric patients.
MATERIAL AND METHOD
The aim of this study is to describe Turkish pediatric surgical nurses’ use of non-pharmacological methods for relieving postoperative pain in 6 to12 year-old children.
Research Design, Setting and Time
To achieve the study aim, a descriptive design was chosen. This research was conducted from seventeen hospitals and samples have been randomly drawn from all hospitals in Turkey between June and September, 2012.
The research sample was comprised of pediatric nurses, who were working in pediatric surgical wards. All nurses in seventeen surgical wards, that had carried out operations for 6-12 year-old children were selected as participants. The questionnaires were distributed to 200 nurses and 92 were returned.
Data Collection Method
Data were collected using a questionnaire. The questionnaire was web based and had to be filled up electronically. All data from questionnaires were collected by the study investigator via email.
All pediatric nurses were informed about the purpose of the study. A cover letter, which described the study briefly, guaranteed anonymity, indicated voluntary participation, and gave the researcher’s contact information, was attached to the questionnaires. All data were kept confidential.
The Survey Questionnaire
The survey questionnaire was prepared after a review of the current literature and three expert nurses, who work in the pediatric unit. [9,12,32]. The questionnaire consisted of four close-ended questions about the pediatric surgical nurses’ socio-demographic characteristics (e.g. age, education) and 14 close-ended questions about nurses’ use of non-pharmacological methods in children’s pain relief and two open-ended questions about limiting factors in nurses’ use of non-pharmacological methods and pediatric nurses’ ways of giving information.
Nurses’ use of non-pharmacological methods in children’s pain and nurses’ preparatory information questionnaire were given on a three-point Likert-type scale ranging from “never/very seldom” and “sometimes” and “nearly always/always”. The content validity of the questionnaire was verified by three expert nurses in pain management and pediatric nursing, and three expert nurses who work in the pediatric unit. Cronbach’s alpha test was used to assess the reliability of the questionnaire. The alpha value for preparatory information (21 sub-items) and the rest of the non-pharmacological methods (14 items) were 0.72 and 0.83, respectively. A pilot study was conducted with 15 pediatric surgical nurses.
Data collected in the research were analyzed on a computer using SPSS for Windows 20.0 packet program and the descriptive statistical methods were used. Cronbach’s alpha test was used to assess the reliability of the questionnaire.
In this study, 48.9% of the pediatric nurses were between the ages of 20-31 years, they had bachelor degree 64.1% and a nursing experience between 10 to 20 years (33.7%); (Table 1).
Vocational health high school
|Experience of pediatric surgical nursing (years)
Pediatric Surgical Nurses’ Use of Non-Pharmacological Methods in Children’s Pain Relief
In this study, 73.9% of the pediatric surgical nurses always used positive reinforcement (especially emotional reinforcement). Whereas, 40.2% sometimes used breathing technique and 44.6% seldom used relaxation. The majority of nurses 70.7% claimed “always” to use positioning as a pain-relieving method, whereas 87.0% seldom used TENS. The majority of nurses 73.9% always used comforting/reassurance, presence 72.8% and touch 70.7%. Almost half of the nurses 48.9% reported always using the method of helping with daily activities. In this study, nurses reported “always” using creating a comfortable environment 62.0% (Table 2).
Pediatric Surgical Nurses’ Preparatory Information Given to Children
A description of the nurses’ preparation information is provided in Table 3. The majority of the pediatric surgical nurses always give information about postoperative observation 79.3%, and postoperative limitations 67.4%, postoperative pain medication 76.1% and postoperative placement 65.2%. The majority of the pediatric nurses reported, that they give information according to the child's age and development 76.1% and, that school-aged children receive more information 73.9%. Additionally, nurses reported, that they encourage the child to ask about misconceptions 69.6% and to talk openly about the child’s sensations.
|Helping with daily activities||12 13.0||35 38.0||45 48.9|
|Creating a comfortable environment||3 3.3||32 34.8||57 62.0|
|Cognitive and sensory information|
|Type of procedure||15 16.3||34 37.0||43 46.7|
|Place of procedure||13 14.1||28 30.4||51 55.4|
|Person who carries out
|13 14.1||27 29.3||52 56.5|
|Purpose of procedure||11 12.0||26 28.3||54 58.7||1 1.1|
|Duration of procedure||16 17.4||31 33.7||41 44.6||4 4.3|
|Preoperative procedures||12 13.0||27 29.3||51 55.4||2 2.2|
|Type of anaesthesia||31 33.7||38 41.3||19 20.7||4 4.3|
|Postoperative placement||9 9.8||21 22.8||60 65.2||2 2.2|
|Postoperative observation||6 6.5||11 12.0||73 79.3||2 2.2|
(e.g. limitations of food and
|6 6.5||22 23.9||62 67.4||2 2.2|
|5 5.4||13 14.1||70 76.1||4 4.3|
|12 13.0||34 37.0||43 46.7||3 3.3|
|Preoperational sensations||20 21.7||32 34.8||38 41.3||2 2.2|
|Sensations during the
|24 26.1||38 41.3||30 32.6|
|Postoperational sensations||21 22.8||30 32.6||41 44.6|
|Ways of giving information|
|Encouraging the child to
ask about misconceptions
|5 5.4||23 25.0||64 69.6|
|Talking openly about the
|10 10.9||25 27.2||57 62.0|
honestly and openly
|6 6.5||36 39.1||50 54.3|
|Making sure that the
information has been
|2 13.0||29 31.5||51 55.4|
|Taking into account the
child’s age and
|6 6.5||16 17.4||70 76.1|
|Giving more information to
a school-aged child
|11 12.0||13 14.1||68 73.9|
Factors Limiting Nurses’ Use of Non-Pharmacological Methods
As shown in Table 4, the most important limiting factor in pediatric nurses’ use of non-pharmacological methods was shortage of nurses and heavy workload 33.7%.
|Shortage of nurses/heavy workload||31||33.7|
|Shortage of nurses/heavy workload/lack of knowledge concerning pain management||26||28.4|
|Shortage of nurses/heavy workload/traditional culture||8||8.7|
|Shortage of nurses/heavy workload/lack of knowledge concerning pain management/traditional culture/use of non-pharmacological methods not a part of conventional postoperative practice||25||29.2|
Many studies in different countries have been conducted to investigate the nurses` non-pharmacological methods to reduce pediatric postoperative pain [9-12,33]. The aim of this study was to describe the Turkish pediatric surgical nurse’s use of non-pharmacological methods for relieving 6 to 12-year-old children’s postoperative pain.
The study gives an informative and detailed picture of Turkish pediatric surgical nurses’ use of non-pharmacological methods on the pediatric surgical wards in the country’s seventeen university hospitals. The sample of nurses did not exactly represent the whole population, because the response rate was too low. A low response rate may be attributed to many factors as lack of time, poor research instruments and demotivated respondents. He et al. reported, that a high response rate 98% indicates a study as important and interesting . This finding is not similar to our results.
In this study, emotional support methods were reported to be the most frequently used. Whereas, He et al. [9, 34] and Çelebioğlu et al.  reported, that cognitive-behavioural methods are most commonly used. This statement is not consistent with our findings. It can be considered, that pediatric surgical nurses working in Turkey feel more adequate in providing emotional support to children. Different cultural and social properties may also play a role, which non-pharmacological pain reducing methods will be preferably chosen by nursing staff. In this research, it was determined, that pediatric surgical nurses used methods reducing pain in children, when giving preoperative information, comforting (reassurance), creating comfortable environment, using distraction and positioning, giving emotional support and helping with daily activities.
Some other studies were consistent with our findings [9-12, 34-37]. However, our results were contradictory to those of some other studies. For example, a study in Canada  showed, that comforting children was not a major activity for nurses and, Coffman et al.  showed, that very few nurses mentioned using a quiet environment as a pain management method. This may be due to the fact that pediatric nurses in Turkey are more susceptible to reducing pain in children. In addition, there may be pain management in in-service training programs for nurses working at hospital.
Preparatory information (including cognitive and sensory information, and different ways of giving information) was the most commonly reported cognitive behavioural strategy used by Chinese nurses  and finnish nurses  studies. In this research study positive reinforcement was the most commonly used cognitive behavioural method. The reason for this fact may be, that the in-service training programs emphasize the importance of supporting patients in medical treatment and care.
In our study, very few nurses 6.5% mentioned using TENS. He et al.  demonstrated, that no nurse used TENS for relieving pain. Pölkki et al.  showed, that nurses do not use TENS in pediatric postoperative care nursing. The reasons possibly were being lack of knowledge and no TENS equipment instrument available in the study wards. In addition, breathing technique, relaxation and massage were used less often than other non-pharmacological methods in this study. These findings are consistent with the study from Rheiner et al. , who also reported, that nurses use less massage and relaxation. Because of shortage of nursing staff in Turkish clinics and intensive patient care, nurses do not apply time-consuming methods such as massage, relaxation and breathing techniques.
The findings of this research study show, that more than the half of nurses gave information to children about postoperative observation, postoperative limitations, postoperative placement and postoperative pain medication. Moreover, our results show, that encouraging children to ask about their misconceptions as well as making sure, that they understand the information, are also warrant for more attention to postoperative pain control. In this study, the half of nurses reported to give routinely preparatory information and the same finding has been revealed in the study from He et al. .
These techniques are time-consuming and we need further clinical trials to investigate these techniques as pain relieving methods for pediatric patients. According to these results, ıt is considered, that nurses in the study from He et al.  pay more attention to inform patients postoperatively about these techniques. It can be concluded, that more attention should be paid to inform patients about other possible pain relieving techniques in these areas to optimize postoperative pain control. On this view, every patient should be given the chance to experience several non-pharmacological pain relieving methods and finally, the patient can decide, which are the best pain relieving methods in his situation.
The way of giving information, our results show, that most of the nurses are always taking the child’s age and development into account and are encouraging the child to ask about misconceptions. Concerning the way of giving information, He et al. showed, that only 58% of nurses nearly always discussed observed fear or anxiety openly with the child . According to our research results, we could demonstrate, that nurses provide information to patients using a more appropriate method (encouraging the child to ask about misconceptions, talking openly about the child’s sansations, giving information honestly and openly, making sure that the information has been understood) and finally pediatric postoperative pain could be reduced more effectively compared to the study from He et al. . In addition, some institutional factors limited nurses’ practical use of non-pharmacological methods in Turkey, the most common factors were shortage of nurses and heavy workload, which is consistent with previous findings [9,10,32]. The present ratio of beds to one nurse is 1:2 in state hospital and 1:2.6 in university hospital in Turkey . However, in the study wards the ratio of beds to one nurse was only 1:8, which is higher than the ratio in USA (1:2) and other developed countries . This means, that an increase is needed in the number of nurses in Turkish hospitals to provide an optimal postoperative patient care.
Reasons for nurses’ lack of knowledge might be, that a specific educational course on pain management is not offered at all levels for nurse education, and pain management is not one of the areas of interest in continuing education for nurses. If nurses would use a task-oriented approach to their work, adding pain management as a part of their routine work, which might be a helpful way to encourage them to implement for pain relief measures . Moreover traditionally, surgical pain is considered inevitable by both nurses and patients themselves, and children should not be encouraged to tolerate pain, which might limit nurses’ motivation to use pain-relieving methods .
The present study has a limitation. The sample size was relatively small and may not represent all pediatric surgical nurses in Turkey. This small size may be nurses’ lack of time, poor research instruments and demotivated respondents. Despite this limitation, the findings of this study support, that non-pharmacological pain management issues should be further considered and, that nursing education (textbooks, curricula) should include a task-oriented approach to use non-pharmacological measures for pain relief.
This study provides new information about Turkish pediatric surgical nurses’ use of non-pharmacological methods with paediatric patients. Turkish nurses used many non-pharmacological methods in relieving school-aged children’s postoperative pain in hospital. Preparatory information, distraction, positive reinforcement, positioning, thermal regulation, comforting/reassurance, touch, presence and helping with daily activities were reported to be used routinely. Whereas relaxation, massage, TENS and brething methods were less often used, but more attention should be paid to such strategies in the pediatric surgical wards, because this techniques also help reduce pediatric postoperative pain and should be investigated in further studies. A detailed education about pain management for nursing staff and informations about possibilities of pain management for children and parents (booklets, audiovisual aids) should be integrated in all hospitals.
All non-pharmacological methods to alleviate children’s postoperative pain can also be established in pediatric day surgery. This study serves as an alert for nurses and other health professionals when they provide information and guidance to parents in pain management. With further testing, the instrument developed for this study serves as a model and may be applicable in other study or working settings as well. More studies are needed to investigate the use of both non-pharmacological and pharmacological methods of pain relief in other provinces in Turkey and in other groups of children, in order to obtain an overall view at the country level.
ETHICS APPROVAL AND CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE
HUMAN AND ANIMAL RIGHTS
No Animals/Humans were used for studies that are base of this research.
CONSENT FOR PUBLICATION
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare no conflict of interest, financial or otherwise.
|||Twycross A, Forgeron P, Williams A. Paediatric nurses’ postoperative pain management practices in hospital based non-critical care settings: a narrative review. Int J Nurs Stud 2015; 52(4): 836-63.
|||Kozlowski LJ, Kost-Byerly S, Colantuoni E, et al. Pain prevalence, intensity, assessment and management in a hospitalized pediatric population. Pain Manag Nurs 2014; 15(1): 22-35.
|||Twycross A, Finley GA. Children’s and parents’ perceptions of postoperative pain management: a mixed methods study. J Clin Nurs 2013; 22(21-22): 3095-108.
|||Kankkunen P, Vehviläinen-Julkunen K, Pietilä AM, et al. Promoting children’s pharmacological postoperative pain alleviation at home. Pediatr Nurs 2009; 35(5): 298-303.
|||He HG, Vehviläinen-Julkunen K, Pölkki T, Pietilä AM. Children’s perceptions on the implementation of methods for their postoperative pain alleviation: an interview study. Int J Nurs Pract 2007; 13(2): 89-99.
|||Sutters KA, Savedra MC, Miaskowski C, et al. Children’s expectations of pain, perceptions of analgesic efficacy, and experiences with nonpharmacologic pain management strategies at home following tonsillectomy. J Spec Pediatr Nurs 2007; 12(3): 139-48.
|||Twycross A. Children’s nurses’ post-operative pain management practices: an observational study. Int J Nurs Stud 2007; 44(6): 869-81.
|||Brasher C, Gafsous B, Dugue S, et al. Postoperative pain management in children and infants: an update. Paediatr Drugs 2014; 16(2): 129-40.
|||He HG, Pölkki T, Vehviläinen-Julkunen K, Pietilä AM. Chinese nurses’ use of non-pharmacological methods in children’s postoperative pain relief. J Adv Nurs 2005; 51(4): 335-42.
|||Woodgate R, Kristjanson LJ. A young child’s pain: how parents and nurses ‘take care’. Int J Nurs Stud 1996; 33(3): 271-84.
|||Caty S, Tourigny J, Koren I. Assessment and management of children’s pain in community hospitals. J Adv Nurs 1995; 22(4): 638-45.
|||Pölkki T, Vehviläinen-Julkunen K, Pietilä AM. Nonpharmacological methods in relieving children’s postoperative pain: a survey on hospital nurses in Finland. J Adv Nurs 2001; 34(4): 483-92.
|||Salanterä S, Lauri S, Salmi TT, Helenius H. Nurses’ knowledge about pharmacological and nonpharmacological pain management in children. J Pain Symptom Manage 1999; 18(4): 289-99.
|||Byrne M. Getting better from my hurts: toward a model of the young child’s pain experience. AORN J 1997; 65(3): 650-2.
|||Vessey JA, Carlson KL. Nonpharmacological interventions to use with children in pain. Issues Compr Pediatr Nurs 1996; 19(3): 169-82.
|||Pölkki T, Pietilä AM, Vehviläinen-Julkunen K, Laukkala H, Kiviluoma K. Imagery-induced relaxation in children’s postoperative pain relief: a randomized pilot study. J Pediatr Nurs 2008; 23(3): 217-24.
|||Ball TM, Shapiro DE, Monheim CJ, Weydert JA. A pilot study of the use of guided imagery for the treatment of recurrent abdominal pain in children. Clinical Pediatrics 2003; 42(6): 527-32.
|||Kahler BM. The effect of distraction and positioning for venous cannulation on pain responses in young children (Doctoral dissertation). Manhattan, KS: Kansas State University 2003.|
|||Sander Wint S, Eshelman D, Steele J, Guzzetta CE. Effects of distraction using virtual reality glasses during lumbar punctures in adolescents with cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum 2002; 29(1): E8-E15.
|||Huth MM, Broome ME, Good M. Imagery reduces children’s post-operative pain. Pain 2004; 110(1-2): 439-48.
|||Kolk AM, van Hoof R, Fiedeldij Dop MJ. Preparing children for venepuncture. The effect of an integrated intervention on distress before and during venepuncture. Child Care Health Dev 2000; 26(3): 251-60.
|||Schaffer SD, Yucha CB. Relaxation & pain management: the relaxation response can play a role in managing chronic and acute pain. Am J Nurs 2004; 104(8): 75-76, 78-79, 81-82.
|||Idvall E, Holm C, Runeson I. Pain experiences and non-pharmacological strategies for pain management after tonsillectomy: a qualitative interview study of children and parents. J Child Health Care 2005; 9(3): 196-207.
|||Manias E, Bucknall T, Botti M. Nurses’ strategies for managing pain in the postoperative setting. Pain Manag Nurs 2005; 6(1): 18-29.
|||Wennström B, Hallberg LR, Bergh I. Use of perioperative dialogues with children undergoing day surgery. J Adv Nurs 2008; 62(1): 96-106.
|||Efe E, Dikmen S, Altaş N, Boneval C. Turkish pediatric surgical nurses’ knowledge and attitudes regarding pain assessment and nonpharmacological and environmental methods in newborns’ pain relief. Pain Manag Nurs 2013; 14(4): 343-50.
|||Tüfekci FG, Ozlu ZK, Arslan S, Canbulat N, Ozkan H. Surgery nurses’ knowledge attitudes and beliefs regarding pain and their perceived barriers for optimal pain management in children. Türkiye Klinikleri J Nurs Sci 2010; 2(2): 123-30. [http://www.turkiyeklinikleri.com/article/tr-58696.html].|
|||Yildirim YK, Çiçek F, Uyar M. Knowledge and attitudes of Turkish oncology nurses about cancer pain management. Pain Manag Nurs 2008; 9(1): 17-25.
|||Akbaş M, Oztunç G. Examination of knowledge about and nursing interventions for the care of patients in pain of nurses who work at Cukurova University medical faculty Balcali hospital. Pain Manag Nurs 2008; 9(3): 88-95.
|||Özyazıcıoğlu N, Çelebioğlu A. Nursing students’ knowledge and views about neonatal pain. Journal of Anatolia Nursing and Health Sciences 2008; 11(3): 9-16.
|||Efe E, Altun E, Cetin H, Işler A. Pediatricians’ and pediatric nurses’ knowledge about pain in newborn infants and their practices in some provinces in Turkey. Agri 2007; 19(3): 16-25.
|||Pölkki T, Laukkala H, Vehviläinen-Julkunen K, Pietilä AM. Factors influencing nurses’ use of nonpharmacological pain alleviation methods in paediatric patients. Scand J Caring Sci 2003; 17(4): 373-83.
|||Li HC, Lopez V. Effectiveness and appropriateness of therapeutic play intervention in preparing children for surgery: a randomized controlled trial study. J Spec Pediatr Nurs 2008; 13(2): 63-73.
|||He HG, Lee TL, Jahja R, et al. The use of nonpharmacological methods for children’s postoperative pain relief: Singapore nurses’ perspectives. J Spec Pediatr Nurs 2011; 16(1): 27-38.
|||Çelebioğlu A, Küçükoğlu S, Odabaşoğlu E. Turkish nurses’ use of nonpharmacological methods for relieving children’s postoperative pain. Altern Ther Health Med 2015; 21(5): 30-5.
|||Rheiner JG, Megel ME, Hiatt M, Halbach R, Cyronek DA, Quinn J. Nurses’ assessments and management of pain in children having orthopedic surgery. Issues Compr Pediatr Nurs 1998; 21(1): 1-18.
|||Aziznejadroshan P, Alhani F, Mohammadi E. Experiences of Iranian Nurses on the Facilitators of Pain Management in Children: A Qualitative Study. Pain Res Treat 2016; 2016: 3594240.
|||Coffman S, Alvarez Y, Pyngolil M, Petit R, Hall C, Smyth M. Nursing assessment and management of pain in critically ill children. Heart Lung 1997; 26(3): 221-8.
|||Güven M. University hospitals in the provision of health care in our country place [http://www.uhbd.org/PDF/sunumlar/1_sunum.pdf]|
|||Wang SF. Comparison of clinical nursing between China and USA. J Pract Nurs 2002; 18: 75. [in Chinese]. [http://www.academia.edu/24630643/Comparison_of_nursing_China_and_the_United_States].|
|||Xia PY. Actuality analysis and related strategies of postoperative pain management. Chin J Curr Clin Med 2004; 2: 563-4. [in Chinese]. [http://en.oversea.cnki.net/kns55/oldnavi/n_Catalog.aspx].|