REVIEW ARTICLE


Effect of Age, Sex and Gender on Pain Sensitivity: A Narrative Review



Hanan G. Eltumi1, 2, Osama A. Tashani1, 2, *
1 Centre for Pain Research, School of Clinical and Applied Sciences Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.
2 Department of Physiology, Faculty of medicine, University of Benghazi, Libya.


Article Metrics

CrossRef Citations:
0
Total Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 5595
Abstract HTML Views: 1701
PDF Downloads: 581
ePub Downloads: 353
Total Views/Downloads: 8230
Unique Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 2435
Abstract HTML Views: 1001
PDF Downloads: 386
ePub Downloads: 212
Total Views/Downloads: 4034



© 2017 Eltumi And Tashani.

open-access license: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode). This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

* Address correspondence to this author at the School of Clinical and Applied Sciences, Leeds Beckett University, City Campus, Leeds LS1 3HE, United Kingdom, Telephone: (UK) 0113 8123858, Fax: 0113 2833124; E-mail: O.Tashani@leedsbeckett.ac.uk


Abstract

Introduction:

An increasing body of literature on sex and gender differences in pain sensitivity has been accumulated in recent years. There is also evidence from epidemiological research that painful conditions are more prevalent in older people. The aim of this narrative review is to critically appraise the relevant literature investigating the presence of age and sex differences in clinical and experimental pain conditions.

Methods:

A scoping search of the literature identifying relevant peer reviewed articles was conducted on May 2016. Information and evidence from the key articles were narratively described and data was quantitatively synthesised to identify gaps of knowledge in the research literature concerning age and sex differences in pain responses.

Results:

This critical appraisal of the literature suggests that the results of the experimental and clinical studies regarding age and sex differences in pain contain some contradictions as far as age differences in pain are concerned. While data from the clinical studies are more consistent and seem to point towards the fact that chronic pain prevalence increases in the elderly findings from the experimental studies on the other hand were inconsistent, with pain threshold increasing with age in some studies and decreasing with age in others.

Conclusion:

There is a need for further research using the latest advanced quantitative sensory testing protocols to measure the function of small nerve fibres that are involved in nociception and pain sensitivity across the human life span.

Implications:

Findings from these studies should feed into and inform evidence emerging from other types of studies (e.g. brain imaging technique and psychometrics) suggesting that pain in the older humans may have unique characteristics that affect how old patients respond to intervention.

Keywords: Age, Sex, Gender, Pain sensitivity, Experimental pain..



1. INTRODUCTION

Age and sex are the main non-modifiable [i.e. cannot be changed] biological factors that affect pain. An increasing body of literature on sex and gender differences in pain sensitivity has been accumulated in recent years. There is also evidence from epidemiological research that painful conditions are more prevalent in older people [1, 2]. Nevertheless, there were few studies that have investigated sex and gender differences throughout the life span [3, 4] and even fewer that have investigated experimental pain sensitivity in older age groups mainly because of challenges in recruiting older healthy pain-free individuals to examine their pain responses in a laboratory [2, 5, 6]. The evidence from experimental pain studies about the effect of age is also complicated by the fact of the complexity of pain in older adults and by the existence of other co-morbidities. In contrast, there are several studies that have reached a consensus regarding sex and gender differences in pain sensitivity [7-10].

Growing evidence suggests that experience of pain is influenced by genotype [11], ethnic characteristics [12], and psychological factors such as anxiety and catastrophising [9]. The age of an individual is also an important factor that affects pain, although there has been relatively little research conducted to date [13-15]. If the underlying causes of the individual differences in pain sensitivity response, including age, are well understood, then the treatment and management approach can be specifically tailored for each individual in order to achieve better pain relief. Individualized treatment and management can be affected at different levels including the choice of type and dosage of analgesic medication, choice of non-drug adjuvants and the approach taken to pain education. For example, elderly individuals might need re-enforced advice and more additional care and support than younger people. Moreover, techniques used for assessment differ according to age. For example, the tools and techniques used to glean present pain intensity ratings differ between young children and elderly individuals with comorbidities such as dementia.

It has been found that age may influence an individual’s experience of pain [13-15]. It has been consistently documented that there is a positive linear relationship between age and chronic pain experience [16]. However, the findings of experimental studies are inconsistent, with some experimental studies showing an increase in pain sensitivity with increasing age, while others found no pain differences between different age groups [15, 17]. Reasons for these inconsistencies include methodological differences between studies, such as the size and type of samples, and the experimental pain techniques employed including the type of stimulus used. Most studies used only one experimental pain induction method and did not compare pain sensitivity response to different types of stimuli [15]. Hence, there is a need for future research to carefully examine pain sensitivity responses using different pain induction techniques within the same group of study participants.

In the last two decades a rapidly growing body of literature on the relationship and mechanisms contributing to variation in pain sensitivity according to sex/gender was published [for reviews see [7, 18]]. Evidence, from this literature, suggests that there are differences between males and females in the way they report their pain in both experimental and clinical situations [7, 19, 20]. The sex differences in reporting of pain in clinical situations are more consistent than sex differences in reporting of pain sensitivity observed in studies exposing healthy humans to experimentally induced pain [8, 9, 21].

The aim of this narrative review is to critically appraise the relevant literature investigating the presence of age and sex differences in clinical and experimental pain conditions to identify gaps of knowledge in the research literature and suggest a strategy for future research concerning the effect of age on pain responses.

1.2. Age Differences in Pain

It has been suggested that the age variable has an effect on pain perception and can explain most of the differences associated with pain [13, 15, 17].

1.2.1. Age Differences in Clinical Pain

There is a consistent positive linear relationship between age and experience of chronic pain [16]. Numerous reviews suggested that an increased frequency, severity, impact, and anatomic distribution of persistent pain have been associated with older aged individuals [2, 22-24]. There is, also, an age-related increase in the prevalence of arthritis [25], fibromyalgia [26] and trigeminal neuralgia [27]. This might be due to poor quality of life and increased probability of physical disability in older people [28]. Although almost all findings in the clinical literature are consistently pointed towards an increase in clinical pain with age [2, 24, 29, 30], the effects of aging on pain perception remain unclear [16].

1.2.2. Age Differences in Experimental Pain

In comparison with data from clinical studies, experimental data on the influence of age on pain are relatively inconsistent and contradictory [15, 17]. For example, while decreased pain thresholds in the elderly have been reported in studies using mechanical pressure [15, 31] and ischemic pain stimuli [32] pain thresholds to electrical stimuli seem to be relatively unchanged [17] and pain thresholds to thermal stimuli, with few exceptions e.g. [33] appear to increase with aging [34-38]. This suggests that the pain induction method chosen is one possible source of this inconsistency. To overcome this problem, a multimodal sensory testing method is needed in future research to widely examine the effect of age on pain experience. In addition, responses to experimental pain stimuli are found to differ according to the site of nociceptors stimulated, duration of the stimulus, quality of noxious sensation tested, and type of nerve fibre stimulated [32]. Accordingly, the effects of these variables on the findings could be reduced, and the limitations of the experiments could be overcome, by examining pain sensitivity responses between different age groups of participants by stimulating the same body site using similar settings.

1.2.3. Physiological Changes with Aging

Aging is usually associated with changes in pain perception, including chronic pain occurrence and pain threshold modification [39]. Aging can be described as a dynamic process in which there are changes and compensations in the structure and function of different physiological and psychological components, including anatomical structures involved in the sensation of pain [6]. There is some debate in the literature about the occurrence of physiological alteration in the processing of nociception and pain, which can be ascribed to age [2, 40, 41]. It is clearly evident that there is a high prevalence of chronic pain in the elderly, and this can be attributed partly to the physiological changes of peripheral and central [38]; pain mechanisms and to changes in some psychological attitudes towards pain [41]. It has been reported that changes in sensations and perceptions in sensory systems occur in the elderly [42]. These perceptual changes, which reflect some overall nervous system changes, are not specifically due to changes of sensory modalities.

A large amount of the literature on the neurobiology of aging suggests that there is a widespread and considerable alteration in the structure, function, and biochemistry of the peripheral [13, 37, 38] and central nervous system [13] structures of older individuals. It has been documented that there is a decrease in the density of myelinated fibres with aging [43-45]. In contrast, some studies have found a decrease in the density of unmyelinated fibres [43, 46], whereas others did not report these changes [47, 48]. It has been recognized that myelinated fibres tend to show more decline in density [43] and function [49] than unmyelinated fibres, as well as decreased nerve conduction velocity and structural modifications in the elderly [38, 44]. Furthermore, it has been suggested that aging processes affect myelinated A delta fibre, but unmyelinated C- fibre appear to be less affected or unaltered [39].

In addition, there is a marked increase in the number of sensory fibres with signs of damage or degeneration, both myelinated and unmyelinated, with advancing age [38, 44, 50]. Aging is found to affect some functional and morphological features of the peripheral nervous system [38]. However, morphological studies have revealed a loss of unmyelinated and myelinated nerve fibres in old people, and some other abnormalities affecting mainly myelinated fibres, such as remyelination, demyelination, and appearance of myelin balloon figures. This deterioration, frequently seen in aged nerves myelin sheaths, may be explained by a decline in the major myelin proteins expression (P0, PMP22, MBP). Axonal atrophy of aged nerve fibres may be owed to a decrease in the expression and axonal transport of cytoskeletal proteins in the peripheral nerve fibre. This may explain some age related differences in pain sensitivity responses using different modalities because different noxious stimuli are found to activate different types of nerve fibres. With aging, there is a slowing in nerve conduction velocity which may result in reduced responses to tactile stimuli and pain perception alteration [38, 42]. In addition, it has been found that in old people, there is a decrease in nerve related body performance [51], and general reduction in neural efficiency, which results in decreasing the capacity of each neural unit [51, 52].

It has also been suggested that there is an extensive degenerative alteration in the spinal dorsal horn sensory neurons of aged subjects [13, 53]. In addition, structural and physiological aging-related changes of many brain regions were reported [51]. The prefrontal cortex, particularly catecholaminergic inputs, is found to be one of the most strongly affected brain regions [54, 55]. Changes like loss of dendritic arborisation, neuronal death, and neurofibrillary abnormalities are found to occur in the cerebral cortex of aging individuals, including areas which are involved in nociceptive processing, like the prefrontal cortex, primary and secondary somatosensory cortex, anterior cingulate, hippocampus, thalamus, and insula [13]. The turnover and concentration of catecholamines [56] GABA [57] and opioid receptors [58] within the limbic system are found to be decreased, as well as serotonin receptor density [59], mainly within the prefrontal cortex and anterior cingulate [60].

It was evident from several biochemical studies that the content of substance P is found to be markedly decreased in the skin of aged people [61] and there is also an evidence of a decline in the rate of CGRP axonal transport with aging [62]. Substance P and CGRP are known to be major neurotransmitters of primary afferent nociceptive fibres, and therefore reduction in the content of neuropeptides might reflect a decrease in the nociceptive nerve density or functional integrity [13]. These findings suggest the presence of lesions and dysfunction in primary afferent sensory neurons in the elderly.

It has also been documented that there is a decrease in the function of the pain inhibitory system with aging [13]. Similarly, it has been found that reduced endogenous pain inhibition is noticed more in older adults compared to younger people [6]. The decreased endogenous analgesic system efficacy is probably expected to cause more severe pain succeeding prolonged noxious stimuli [13].

A growing body of literature on cognitive function in the elderly suggests that there are deficits in multiple cognitive domains in aged adults including executive function, episodic memory, attention, inhibition, and working memory [51, 63]. Moreover, it has been reported that with normal aging there are some working memory capacity limitations, decline in psychomotor skills, and slowing in the speed of processing [42]. The structural, molecular, and cellular changes associated with the aging process result in extensive reduction in neural and metabolic efficiency and this might probably be the cause of capacity limitations in the elderly [51, 64].

There is also an evidence from both animal and human studies that Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal axis activity contributes to biological aging by affecting glucocorticoid secretion and altering the synthesis of regulatory peptides and ultimately affecting the processing of pain experience.

1.3. Sex Differences in Pain

To comprehend the differences between males and females in pain sensitivity response, it is important first to discuss the differences between the terms sex and gender and their relationship to each other, which will hopefully provide the theoretical basis for the precise use of each term.

1.3.1. Distinguishing Between Sex and Gender

The terms sex and gender are often used interchangeably in conversation. The World Health Organization (WHO, 2014) defines sex as “the biological and psychological aspects of men and women” and defines gender as “the socially built characters, behaviours, and events that a given society reflects which is suitable for each one of men and women”. Clearly, characteristics of gender might differ considerably between communities and societies.

Sex is referred to as the way by which organisms are classified on the basis of their reproductive systems and the chromosomal complement allocated functions. Gender on the other hand is a self-representation of the individual as a male or female, or how the social institution will respond to that individual on the basis of gender presentation of the individual [65]. It has been reported by Greenspan that the term “gender differences” should be used if the gender is exactly debated [9]. In this narrative review the terms sex differences or sex/ gender differences will be, mostly interchangeably, used to indicate that sex/gender are being used as indicators, not as a reference to biological aetiology as argued by Deaux [66] or self-representation of an individual as male or female as argued by Wizemann and Pardue [65]. Though, in many situations when it is difficult to determine which term is accountable for the differences, and because, as it has been reported that gender is mostly ascertained by sex of the person, the terms sex or sex/gender will be used [10].

The effect of sex and gender on pain has recently been discussed as an important topic by many researchers. Most of the previous clinical and experimental studies have found that males and females differ in their experience of pain [7].

1.3.2. Sex Differences in Clinical Pain

There is a higher prevalence of certain painful conditions in females including temporomandibular joint disorder [67], Fibromyalgia [7, 21], and headaches and migraines [68]. Overall, women are more likely to experience chronic pain [7], present with pain at multiple sites [21] and be more immobilised by pain than men [69].

1.3.3. Sex Differences in Experimental Pain

Females have been found to have higher pain sensitivity responses than males [70]. Evidence suggests that females report lower pain thresholds and pain tolerances and higher pain intensity to experimental pain than males [7]. It is also claimed that in the same pain conditions, females experience more severe, anatomically diffused, and long lasting experimental pain than males, although evidence is not as strong [71]. Moreover, a review of experimental studies by Racine et al. (2012) found that sex differences in response to experimental pain were not consistent in all studies [72]. Thus, there appears to be more consistency in sex differences in clinical pain studies than experimental studies. Nevertheless, although some researchers found that females seem to be more sensitive to both clinical and experimental pain as compared to males, some other researchers presented no difference. Differences in pain sensitivity response between males and females could be influenced by many factors.

1.3.4. Factors Affecting Sex Differences in Pain

Biological, psychological, and social factors influence sex differences in pain response. Experimenter appearance and possible personal biases might also have an effect [73].

1.3.4.1. Biological Mechanisms

To understand the differences between males and females in pain experience, it is important to know the effect of sex hormones. As sex hormones are found to fluctuate along the menstrual cycle in females, some investigators interpreted the presence of sex differences to pain owing to the influence of gonadal hormones [74]. There are two main gonadal hormones [sex hormones] in females, oestrogen and progesterone, and the levels of these two hormones varies across the menstrual cycle. Physiologically, the menstrual cycle is divided into three stages: the follicular phase, the ovulatory phase, and the luteal phase. The follicular phase is characterised by low levels of oestrogen and progesterone and high levels of the follicular stimulating hormone [FSH]. The ovulatory phase is characterised by a peak concentration of oestrogen and the peak of luteinizing hormone [LH]. The luteal phase is characterised by high levels of progesterone and low levels of FSH, LH, and oestrogen [75]. It is claimed that the gender differences in pain sensitivity is due in part to the effect of gonadal hormones [74]. For example, from a clinical point of view, some researchers established that there is an increase in pain sensitivity at times of the lowest oestrogen or rapidly fluctuating oestrogen in normally menstruating women [67, 76]. Moreover, it has been found that many clinical pain conditions in females are found to vary with the menstrual cycle phases and throughout pregnancy, mainly, tempromandibular (TMD) [67], migraine [77], tension-type headache [78, 79], fibromyalgia [80], and irritable bowel syndrome [81].

There are a substantial number of experimental studies that have used noxious stimuli to examine pain sensitivity in females throughout the menstrual cycle. Previous studies have demonstrated that there is a variation in pain reaction in normally menstruating women according to their cycle phase. A lower pain threshold [i.e. higher pain sensitivity] during the premenstrual phase [5 days before bleeding] has been reported by Herren who used pressure pain stimuli [82] and Procacci et al. [1974], who used radiant heat stimulation [83]. In contrast, a higher threshold and tolerances in the premenstrual phase have been found by Aberger et al. [1983] who used the muscle ischaemia task [84]. It is revealed that that the highest level of pain sensitivity was one week following menstruation (days 1-7), and the lowest level of pain sensitivity was during ovulation (days 15-21)[85]. It is documented that the effect of variation in gonadal hormone levels across the menstrual cycle on female sensitivity to pain was small and had only a minor contribution to gender differences in pain [70]. The result of a meta-analysis of studies investigating the relationship between pain sensitivity and the menstrual cycle conducted by Riley et al. [1999] suggested less pain sensitivity for pressure induced pain, thermal heat stimulation, cold pressor tests or ischaemic muscle pain was demonstrated during the follicular phase (days 6-11) in healthy menstruating females [86]. The least pain sensitivity for electrical stimulation was demonstrated in the luteal phase (days 17-23) [69]. In contrast, pain thresholds elicited by cold pressor stimuli in females was found to be higher during the late ovulatory phase (days 20-24) [87].

On the other hand, some investigators have concluded that there are no differences in pain sensitivity responses throughout the menstrual cycle [88-90]. A review by Sherman and LeResche (2006) revealed that there was no evidence that gonadal hormone changes across the menstrual cycle affect responses to experimental pain [76]. It has been reported that although females were found to be more sensitive to a range of pain modalities than males, menstrual cycle stages did not explain these differences [91]. A study done by Bartley and Rhudy (2013) also found no effect of the menstrual cycle on experimental pain [92].

It is clear that more research is needed in this area and as most of the experiments relied mainly on women reporting their menstrual cycle phase it is advised that future experiments should involve a hormonal essays and correlate that with pain sensitivity response. Another confounding factor which is often ignored is the stress and anxiety of women during different menstrual cycle phases.

1.3.4.2. Psychosocial Mechanisms

A growing body of literature agrees that pain is affected by psychological factors and this effect of psychological factors gives an explanation for a number of differences connected with pain [9].

It has been demonstrated that the differences between males and females in sensitivity to pain are affected by psychological factors like anxiety [9, 93]. Moreover, anxiety has been recognised to be associated with gender differences in pain responses [94] and might be more associated with pain in males [7]. Each pain stimulus technique causes different levels of unpleasantness, for example, it has been stated by Rainville and others that in contrast to heat and electrical shock stimuli, cold and ischemic techniques are more likely to be accompanied by a higher level of unpleasantness [95]. Furthermore, in comparison with other noxious stimulus, the perfect pain stimulus to study the influence of anxiety is thought to be heat pain, because of its lower level of unpleasantness [95]. It is noticeable that there is a strong association between chronic pain in men and anxiety [96]. Although post-surgical pain is more intense in women than men, men are more troubled by low and persistent levels of pain [97].

Gender role is another psychological factor that might affect the difference in pain sensitivity response. The term “gender role” has been used to refer to a socially accepted group of features sanctioned to each sex [98]. It has been argued that gender roles seem to have an influence on sex differences in pain sensitivity response [9, 98]. Although the strength of the influence of gender roles on the sensitivity to pain is still uncertain [99, 100]. When Otto and Dougher [1985] measured gender roles and investigated its relationship with pressure pain, a significant correlation between masculinity-femininity and pain threshold was observed for males, but not for female participants [101]. In a different study, Dixon et al. (2004) investigated the relationship between gender-related personality types and pain sensitivity; and concluded that there is a negative correlation between masculinity-femininity scores and cold pain tolerance [102].

Although pain is a worldwide health problem affecting all populations, the elderly and women were found to be over-represented [103]; the role of age and sex/gender is unclear due to the inconsistency in research findings. Methodological variations in study design may be one factor leading to inconsistent findings. In experimental pain studies, the type of stimulus induction method used may influence outcome. Therefore, there is a need to discuss the different methods of experimental pain techniques, which will hopefully provide the theoretical guidance for the specific method to be used.

1.4. Future Research

There is a need for further research using the latest advanced quantitative sensory testing protocols to measure the function of small nerve fibres that are involved in nociception and pain sensitivity across the human life span. Findings from these studies should feed into and inform evidence emerging from other types of studies (e.g. brain imaging technique and psychometrics) suggesting that pain in the older humans may have unique characteristics that affect how old patients respond to intervention. This basic science approach should also complement the acquisition of clinical data relevant to age from patients with pain as while age, sex and other clinical data are routinely recorded in patients’ reports, it is seldom for nurses and clinicians to include detailed reporting of pain episodes and its treatment, therefore several databases of medical records lack essential information about descriptors, severity and frequency of pain in many clinical pain conditions. Information about responses to different pain treatments is also lacking. To better understand how pain changes course through the human life spanm it is essential to obtain such information. Future research, therefore, has to fill the gaps and longitudinal databases should be improved. Therefore, we suggest that a much better future research strategy to better understand the mechanism of age-related pain should include basic science experiments in a controlled environment and encourage an epidemiological approach aimed to cover different pain conditions through the life span.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the critical appraisal of the literature suggests that the results of the experimental and clinical studies regarding age differences to pain contain some contradictions. This is because pain in older people is complex [104] and their response to different stimuli and to treatment may vary and future standardised testing and research methodologies are needed. However, data from the clinical studies are more consistent that experimental data and seem to point towards the fact that chronic pain increases in the elderly. Findings from the experimental studies on the other hand were contradictory, with pain threshold increasing with age in some studies e.g. [35, 105] and decreasing with age in others e.g. [15, 31]. We suggested that a combined research approach should include a full battery of quantitative sensory testing to examine the same body sites under the same settings of different age groups to better inform the literature.

Furthermore, regarding sex differences to pain, most studies were consistent in the direction that females seem to be more sensitive to experimentally induced pain and more exposed to some diseases in comparison with males.

In addition, the causes underlying these differences, as well as the interaction between age, sex, and pain, are still unclear. More importantly, most of the studies have investigated the age differences and the sex differences to pain separately. So, there is a need to further examine the interaction between age, sex, and pain.

ETHICS APPROVAL AND CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE

Not applicable.

HUMAN AND ANIMAL RIGHTS

No Animals/Humans were used for studies that are base of this research.

CONSENT FOR PUBLICATION

Not applicable.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors have no conflict of interest relevant to this publication.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors wish to thank the University of Benghazi for financial support of the first author during the writing up phase of this review and Professor Mark I. Johnson from the Centre for Pain Research, Leeds Beckett University for his encouragement and support.

REFERENCES

[1] Helme R. Gibson S Pain in older people I: Crombie IK. PR: Croft 1999.
[2] Schofield P, O’Mahony S, Collett B, Potter J. Guidance for the assessment of pain in older adults: a literature review. Br J Nurs 2008; 17(14): 914-8.
[3] Becklake MR, Kauffmann F. Gender differences in airway behaviour over the human life span. Thorax 1999; 54(12): 1119-38.
[4] Diehl M, Coyle N, Labouvie-Vief G. Age and sex differences in strategies of coping and defense across the life span. Psychol Aging 1996; 11(1): 127-39.
[5] Herr KA, Spratt K, Mobily PR, Richardson G. Pain intensity assessment in older adults: use of experimental pain to compare psychometric properties and usability of selected pain scales with younger adults. Clin J Pain 2004; 20(4): 207-19.
[6] Riley JL III, King CD, Wong F, Fillingim RB, Mauderli AP. Lack of endogenous modulation and reduced decay of prolonged heat pain in older adults. Pain 2010; 150(1): 153-60.
[7] Fillingim RB, King CD, Ribeiro-Dasilva MC, Rahim-Williams B, Riley JL III. Sex, gender, and pain: a review of recent clinical and experimental findings. J Pain 2009; 10(5): 447-85.
[8] Derbyshire SW. Sources of variation in assessing male and female responses to pain. New Ideas Psychol 1997; 15(1): 83-95.
[9] Greenspan JD, Craft RM, LeResche L, et al. Studying sex and gender differences in pain and analgesia: a consensus report. Pain 2007; 132(Suppl. 1): S26-45.
[10] Alabas OA, Tashani OA, Johnson MI. Gender role expectations of pain mediate sex differences in cold pain responses in healthy Libyans. Eur J Pain 2012; 16(2): 300-11.
[11] Nielsen CS, Staud R, Price DD. Individual differences in pain sensitivity: measurement, causation, and consequences. J Pain 2009; 10(3): 231-7.
[12] Rahim-Williams B RJ 3rd, Williams AK, Fillingim RB. A quantitative quantitative review of ethnic group differences in experimental pain Response: Do biology, psychology, and culture matter? Pain Med 2012; 13(4): 522-40.
[13] Gibson SJ, Farrell M. A review of age differences in the neurophysiology of nociception and the perceptual experience of pain. Clin J Pain 2004; 20(4): 227-39.
[14] Helme RD, Meliala A, Gibson SJ. Methodologic factors which contribute to variations in experimental pain threshold reported for older people. Neurosci Lett 2004; 361(1-3): 144-6.
[15] Lautenbacher S, Kunz M, Strate P, Nielsen J, Arendt-Nielsen L. Age effects on pain thresholds, temporal summation and spatial summation of heat and pressure pain. Pain 2005; 115(3): 410-8.
[16] Edwards RR, Fillingim RB. Effects of age on temporal summation and habituation of thermal pain: clinical relevance in healthy older and younger adults. J Pain 2001; 2(6): 307-17.
[17] Gibson SJ, Helme RD. Age-related differences in pain perception and report. Clin Geriatr Med 2001; 17(3): 433-456, v-vi.
[18] Boerner K E BK, Caes L, Schinkel M, Chambers CT. Sex differences in experimental pain among healthy children: A systematic review and Meta-analysis. Pain 2014; 155(5): 983-3.
[19] Moqil JS, Bailey AL. Sex and gender differences in pain and analgesia. Prog Brain Res 2010; 186-41.
[20] Leresche L. Defining Gender Disparities in Pain Management. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011; 469(7): 1871-7.
[21] Berkley KJ. Sex differences in pain. Behav Brain Sci 1997; 20(3): 371-80.
[22] Gagliese L, Melzack R. Chronic pain in elderly people. Pain 1997; 70(1): 3-14.
[23] Harkins SW. Geriatric pain. Pain perceptions in the old. Clin Geriatr Med 1996; 12(3): 435-59.
[24] Yezierski RP. The effects of age on pain sensitivity: preclinical studies. Pain Med 2012; 13(s2)(Suppl. 2): S27-36.
[25] Badley EM, Tennant A. Changing profile of joint disorders with age: findings from a postal survey of the population of Calderdale, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom. Ann Rheum Dis 1992; 51(3): 366-71.
[26] Wolfe F, Ross K, Anderson J, Russell IJ, Hebert L. The prevalence and characteristics of fibromyalgia in the general population. Arthritis Rheum 1995; 38(1): 19-28.
[27] Kitt CA, Gruber K, Davis M, Woolf CJ, Levine JD. Trigeminal neuralgia: opportunities for research and treatment. Pain 2000; 85(1-2): 3-7.
[28] Scudds RJ, McD Robertson J. Empirical evidence of the association between the presence of musculoskeletal pain and physical disability in community-dwelling senior citizens. Pain 1998; 75(2-3): 229-35.
[29] Gibson SJ, Katz B, Corran TM, Farrell MJ, Helme RD. Pain in older persons. Disabil Rehabil 1994; 16(3): 127-39.
[30] Hwang U, Belland LK, Handel DA, et al. Is all pain is treated equally? A multicenter evaluation of acute pain care by age. Pain 2014; 155(12): 2568-74.
[31] Pickering G, Jourdan D, Eschalier A, Dubray C. Impact of age, gender and cognitive functioning on pain perception. Gerontology 2002; 48(2): 112-8.
[32] Edwards RR, Fillingim RB. Age-associated differences in responses to noxious stimuli. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2001; 56(3): M180-5.
[33] Harkins SW, Chapman CR. Detection and decision factors in pain perception in young and elderly men. Pain 1976; 2(3): 253-64.
[34] Gibson SJ, LeVasseur SA, Helme RD. Cerebral event-related responses induced by CO2 laser stimulation in subjects suffering from cervico-brachial syndrome. Pain 1991; 47(2): 173-82.
[35] Chakour M. Gibson S, Bradbeer M, Helme R. The effect of age on Aδ-and C-fibre thermal pain perception. Pain 1996; 64(1): 143-52.
[36] Larivière M, Goffaux P, Marchand S, Julien N. Changes in pain perception and descending inhibitory controls start at middle age in healthy adults. Clin J Pain 2007; 23(6): 506-10.
[37] Marouf R, Caron S, Lussier M, Bherer L, Piché M, Rainville P. Reduced pain inhibition is associated with reduced cognitive inhibition in healthy aging. Pain 2014; 155(3): 494-502.
[38] Verdú E, Ceballos D, Vilches JJ, Navarro X. Influence of aging on peripheral nerve function and regeneration. J Peripher Nerv Syst 2000; 5(4): 191-208.
[39] Kemp J, Després O, Pebayle T, Dufour A. Differences in age-related effects on myelinated and unmyelinated peripheral fibres: a sensitivity and evoked potentials study. Eur J Pain 2014; 18(4): 482-8.
[40] Edwards R. Age-associated differences in pain perception and pain processing. Prog Pain Res Manag 2005; 35: 45.
[41] Pickering G. Age differences in clinical pain states. Prog Pain Res Manag 2005; 35: 67.
[42] Bonder BR. WM Functional Performance in Older Adults. Philadelphia: FA Davis 2001.
[43] Ochoa J, Mair WG. The normal sural nerve in man. I. Ultrastructure and numbers of fibres and cells. Acta Neuropathol 1969; 13(3): 197-216.
[44] Drac H, Babiuch M, Wiśniewska W. Morphological and biochemical changes in peripheral nerves with aging. Neuropatol Pol 1991; 29(1-2): 49-67.
[45] Moriyama H, Amano K, Itoh M, Shimada K, Otsuka N. Morphometric aspects of peripheral nerves in adults and the elderly. J Peripher Nerv Syst 2007; 12(3): 205-9.
[46] Jacobs JM, Love S. Qualitative and quantitative morphology of human sural nerve at different ages. Brain 1985; 108(Pt 4): 897-924.
[47] Sharma AK, Thomas PK. Peripheral nerve regeneration in experimental diabetes. J Neurol Sci 1975; 24(4): 417-24.
[48] Kanda T, Tsukagoshi H, Oda M, Miyamoto K, Tanabe H. Morphological changes in unmyelinated nerve fibres in the sural nerve with age. Brain 1991; 114(Pt 1B): 585-99.
[49] Katzman R. Principles of geriatric neurology. FA Davis Company 1992.
[50] Adler G, Nacimiento AC. Age-dependent changes of short-latency somatosensory evoked potentials in healthy adults. Appl Neurophysiol 1988; 51(1): 55-9.
[51] Mattay VS, Fera F, Tessitore A, et al. Neurophysiological correlates of age-related changes in working memory capacity. Neurosci Lett 2006; 392(1-2): 32-7.
[52] Reuter-Lorenz PA. Stanczak L, Miller AC. Neural recruitment and cognitive aging: Two hemispheres are better than one, especially as you age. Psychol Sci 1999; 10(6): 494-500.
[53] Prineas J, Spencer P. Pathology of the nerve cell body in disorders of the peripheral nervous system. Peripheral Neuropathy 1975; 1: 253.
[54] Arnsten AF. Catecholamine modulation of prefrontal cortical cognitive function. Trends Cogn Sci (Regul Ed) 1998; 2(11): 436-47.
[55] Volkow ND, Gur RC, Wang G-J, et al. Association between decline in brain dopamine activity with age and cognitive and motor impairment in healthy individuals. Am J Psychiatry 1998; 155(3): 344-9.
[56] Barili P, De Carolis G, Zaccheo D, Amenta F. Sensitivity to ageing of the limbic dopaminergic system: a review. Mech Ageing Dev 1998; 106(1-2): 57-92.
[57] Spokes EG. An analysis of factors influencing measurements of dopamine, noradrenaline, glutamate decarboxylase and choline acetylase in human post-mortem brain tissue. Brain 1979; 102(2): 333-46.
[58] Amenta F, Zaccheo D, Collier WL. Neurotransmitters, neuroreceptors and aging. Mech Ageing Dev 1991; 61(3): 249-73.
[59] Kakiuchi T, Nishiyama S, Sato K, Ohba H, Nakanishi S, Tsukada H. Age-related reduction of [11C]MDL100,907 binding to central 5-HT(2A) receptors: PET study in the conscious monkey brain. Brain Res 2000; 883(1): 135-42.
[60] Sheline YI. Mintun MA, Moerlein SM, Snyder AZ. Greater loss of 5-HT2A receptors in midlife than in late life. Am J Psychiatry 2002; 159(3): 430-5.
[61] Helme RD, McKernan S. Neurogenic flare responses following topical application of capsaicin in humans. Ann. Neurol. 1985 Oct 1;18(4):505-9.
[62] Fernandez HL, Hodges-Savola CA. Axoplasmic transport of calcitonin gene-related peptide in rat peripheral nerve as a function of age. Neurochem Res 1994; 19(11): 1369-77.
[63] Hedden T, Gabrieli JD. Insights into the ageing mind: a view from cognitive neuroscience. Nat Rev Neurosci 2004; 5(2): 87-96.
[64] Pradhan SN. Central neurotransmitters and aging. Life Sci 1980; 26(20): 1643-56.
[65] Wizemann TM. Pardue M-L Exploring the biological contributions to human health: does sex matter?. National Academies Press 2001.
[66] Deaux K. Commentary: Sorry, wrong number: A reply to Gentile's call. 1993.
[67] LeResche L, Mancl L, Sherman JJ, Gandara B, Dworkin SF. Changes in temporomandibular pain and other symptoms across the menstrual cycle. Pain 2003; 106(3): 253-61.
[68] Unruh AM. Gender variations in clinical pain experience. Pain 1996; 65(2-3): 123-67.
[69] Mullersdorf M, Soderback I. The actual state of the effects, treatment and incidence of disabling pain in a gender perspective-a Swedish study. Disability Rehabil. 2000; 22(18):840-54.
[70] Riley JL III, Robinson ME, Wise EA, Myers CD, Fillingim RB. Sex differences in the perception of noxious experimental stimuli: a meta-analysis. Pain 1998; 74(2-3): 181-7.
[71] Paller CJ, Campbell CM, Edwards RR, Dobs AS. Sex-based differences in pain perception and treatment. Pain Med 2009; 10(2): 289-99.
[72] Racine M, Tousignant-Laflamme Y, Kloda LA, Dion D, Dupuis G, Choinière M. A systematic literature review of 10 years of research on sex/gender and experimental pain perception - part 1: are there really differences between women and men? Pain 2012; 153(3): 602-18.
[73] Wise EA, Price DD, Myers CD, Heft MW, Robinson ME. Gender role expectations of pain: relationship to experimental pain perception. Pain 2002; 96(3): 335-42.
[74] Stoffel EC, Ulibarri CM, Craft RM. Gonadal steroid hormone modulation of nociception, morphine antinociception and reproductive indices in male and female rats. Pain 2003; 103(3): 285-302.
[75] Marchand S. Differences between men and women in pain. In: The phenomenon of pain. Seattle: IASP Press 2012.
[76] Sherman JJ, LeResche L. Does experimental pain response vary across the menstrual cycle? A methodological review. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2006; 291(2): R245-56.
[77] Brandes JL. The influence of estrogen on migraine: a systematic review. JAMA 2006; 295(15): 1824-30.
[78] Johannes C. Linet M, Stewart W, Celentano D, Lipton R, Szklo M. Relationship of headache to phase of the menstrual cycle among young women A daily diary study. Neurology 1995; 45(6): 1076-82.
[79] Kappius RE, Goolkasian P. Group and menstrual phase effect in reported headaches among college students. Headache 1987; 27(9): 491-4.
[80] Alonso C, Loevinger BL, Muller D, Coe CL. Menstrual cycle influences on pain and emotion in women with fibromyalgia. J Psychosom Res 2004; 57(5): 451-8.
[81] Heitkemper MM, Cain KC, Jarrett ME, Burr RL, Hertig V, Bond EF. Symptoms across the menstrual cycle in women with irritable bowel syndrome. Am J Gastroenterol 2003; 98(2): 420-30.
[82] Herren RY. The effect of high and low female sex hormone concentration on the two-point threshold of pain and touch and upon tactile sensitivity. J Exp Psychol 1933; 16(2): 324.
[83] Procacci P. Zoppi M, Maresca M, Romano S. Studies on the pain threshold in man. Adv Neurol 1974; 4: 107-13.
[84] Aberger EW, Denney DR, Hutchings DF. Pain sensitivity and coping strategies among dysmenorrheic women: much ado about nothing. Behav Res Ther 1983; 21(2): 119-27.
[85] Tedford W. Warren D, Flynn W. Alteration of shock aversion thresholds during the menstrual cycle. Percept Psychophys 1977; 21(2): 193-6.
[86] Riley JL III, Robinson ME, Wise EA, Price DD. A meta-analytic review of pain perception across the menstrual cycle. Pain 1999; 81(3): 225-35.
[87] Hellström B, Lundberg U. Pain perception to the cold pressor test during the menstrual cycle in relation to estrogen levels and a comparison with men. Integr Physiol Behav Sci 2000; 35(2): 132-41.
[88] Veith JL, Anderson J, Slade SA, Thompson P, Laugel GR, Getzlaf S. Plasma β-endorphin, pain thresholds and anxiety levels across the human menstrual cycle. Physiol Behav 1984; 32(1): 31-4.
[89] Kuczmierczyk AR, Adams HE, Calhoun KS, et al. Pain responsivity in women with premenstrual syndrome across the menstrual cycle. Percept Mot Skills 1986; 63(2 Pt 1): 387-93.
[90] Amodei N, Nelson-Gray RO. Reactions of dysmenorrheic and nondysmenorrheic women to experimentally induced pain throughout the menstrual cycle. J Behav Med 1989; 12(4): 373-85.
[91] Klatzkin RR, Mechlin B, Girdler SS. Menstrual cycle phase does not influence gender differences in experimental pain sensitivity. Eur J Pain 2010; 14(1): 77-82.
[92] Bartley EJ, Rhudy JL. Comparing pain sensitivity and the nociceptive flexion reflex threshold across the mid-follicular and late-luteal menstrual phases in healthy women. Clin J Pain 2013; 29(2): 154-61.
[93] Fillingim RB, Hastie BA, Ness TJ, Glover TL, Campbell CM, Staud R. Sex-related psychological predictors of baseline pain perception and analgesic responses to pentazocine. Biol Psychol 2005; 69(1): 97-112.
[94] Goffaux P, Michaud K, Gaudreau J, Chalaye P, Rainville P, Marchand S. Sex differences in perceived pain are affected by an anxious brain. Pain 2011; 152(9): 2065-73.
[95] Rainville P, Feine JS, Bushnell MC, Duncan GH. A psychophysical comparison of sensory and affective responses to four modalities of experimental pain. Somatosens Mot Res 1992; 9(4): 265-77.
[96] Riley JL, Robinson ME, Wade JB, Myers CD, Price DD. Sex differences in negative emotional responses to chronic pain. J Pain 2001; 2(6): 354-9.
[97] Morin C, Lund JP, Villarroel T, Clokie CM, Feine JS. Differences between the sexes in post-surgical pain. Pain 2000; 85(1-2): 79-85.
[98] Bernardes SF, Keogh E, Lima ML. Bridging the gap between pain and gender research: a selective literature review. Eur J Pain 2008; 12(4): 427-40.
[99] Chesterton LS, Barlas P, Foster NE, Baxter GD, Wright CC. Gender differences in pressure pain threshold in healthy humans. Pain 2003; 101(3): 259-66.
[100] Garcia E, Godoy-Izquierdo D, Godoy JF, Perez M, Lopez-Chicheri I. Gender differences in pressure pain threshold in a repeated measures assessment. Psychol Health Med 2007; 12(5): 567-79.
[101] Otto MW, Dougher MJ. Sex differences and personality factors in responsivity to pain. Percept Mot Skills 1985; 61(2): 383-90.
[102] Dixon KE, Thorn BE, Ward LC. An evaluation of sex differences in psychological and physiological responses to experimentally-induced pain: a path analytic description. Pain 2004; 112(1-2): 188-96.
[103] Goldberg DS, McGee SJ. Pain as a global public health priority. BMC Public Health 2011; 11(1): 770.
[104] Fillingim RB, Turk DC, Yezierski RP. Pain in the Elderly. In: Advances in Geroscience. Springer International Publishing 2016; pp. 551-92.
[105] Jensen MP, Karoly P. Self-report scales and procedures for assessing pain in adults. 1992.